home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: huey.cadvision.com!usenet
- From: bros@cadvision.com ('Night Manager')
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: OS features
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 1996 00:50:15 GMT
- Organization: CADVision
- Message-ID: <4c7b92$1g7k@huey.cadvision.com>
- References: <4aj1tc$39r@candelo.dpie.gov.au> <wzskcMD1A7aez4@0dietmar.tomate.tng.oche.de> <13213377@sourcery.han.de> <569.6564T692T2329@datashopper.dk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cad114.cadvision.com
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- mba@datashopper.dk (Michael B Andersen) wrote:
-
- >If!. Our beloved OS is going to "hack it" against the big boys, it's critical
- >that all "RE-BOOTs" be removed, in other words, IMHO people will be looking
- >for OS's that don't "break" when programs fail, in the coming years. So I find
- >it crutial that the operating system is crash proof, and I don't see any way
- >that can be done without memory protection.
-
- This is nothing new. Having an OS that doesn't crash is a BIG thing. As for
- going up against the 'big boys' the only two operating systems that ADos 3.x
- or the new version might have problems with is UNIX and Apple's new OS.
-
- Win '95 is not even in the running. As far as I am concerned when the OS is
- slowed down by disk access that is not an OS it is just an over blown VRam
- program.
-
-
-